Is N Chandrasekaran's Tata Sons Reappointment Valid? Why Is Tata Trusts Citing the AoA, 4:1 Vote and 'Failed Condition' - What Does It Mean?
India, Sept. 21 -- The reappointment of N Chandrasekaran as Tata Sons chairman has triggered a major corporate governance dispute after Tata Trusts challenged the validity of the company board's September 17 decision.
The Tata Sons board approved a fresh five-year term for Chandrasekaran by a 4:1 vote. However, Tata Trusts, which holds about 66% of Tata Sons, says the overall board majority does not settle the matter because the company's Articles of Association (AoA) impose a separate requirement involving directors nominated by the Trusts.
At the September 17 meeting, Tata Trusts Chairman Noel Tata voted against Chandrasekaran's reappointment, while the other Trust-nominated director, Venu Srinivasan, supported it. Tata Trusts argues ...
Click here to read full article from source
To read the full article or to get the complete feed from this publication, please
Contact Us.