Srinagar, June 22 -- A dispute over a pacemaker procedure involving a Kashmir cardiologist has ignited widespread discussion online. But beneath the controversy lies a deeper concern about a culture that often treats allegations as conclusions and suspicion as proof.

Shortly after news of the incident surfaced, social media platforms erupted with commentary. Large sections of Facebook had already reached a verdict even before investigators examined records, gathered testimony, or established facts.

A dangerous inversion has taken root in many online spaces. Guilt now comes first, while proof is expected later. Reputations stand trial before inquiries even begin.

Authorities have ordered an investigation and placed the doctor under scru...