RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3:
1. Heard the parties.
2. Contention of the petitioner is that due to inadvertence, the petitioner in the application form had declared herself as a BCII candidate whereas the petitioner, in fact is a BC-I candidate. Thus, she claims that she should be considered as a BC-I candidate and accordingly she should be appointed.
3. During course of argument, on the last date, it was submitted that the petitioner has obtained 328 marks and the private respondent who has been appointed, has obtained 350 marks. The private respondent is also in BC-I category.
4. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the respondent-JPSC submits that there are s...