NAINITAL, India, July 9 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on June 18:
BA1 No. 621 of 2026
Ankit Mistry
--Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
HON'BLE RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
1. Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Present applicant Ankit Mistry is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 02.07.2025 bearing FIR No. 194 of 2025, P.S. Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 64, 351(2) of BNS read with Section 5/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 67B of the IT Act.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the appli...