HC: Why is Parth not an accused?
MUMBAI, Sept. 10 -- The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra Director General of Police (DGP) to explain why deputy chief minister Sunetra Pawar's son and Rajya Sabha MP Parth Pawar has not been named as an accused in the Mundhwa land deal case, although he owns 99% of Amadea Enterprises LLP, which purchased the 40-acre plot.
A single judge bench of justice Madhav Jamdar issued the directions while hearing an anticipatory bail plea filed by Pune tehsildar Suryakant Yewale, accused of misusing his power to issue orders granting ownership rights to Amadea Enterprises.
The company, jointly owned by Parth and his cousin Digvijay Patil, had purchased the government-owned Mahar Watan land parcel valued at Rs.1,800 crore for just Rs.300 crore, although it was not allowed to be sold to a private party. The sale agreement was executed on May 20 last year with Shital Tejwani, a Pune resident and power-of-attorney holder for 272 people to whom the government land had been transferred. The company had paid just Rs.500 as stamp duty after seeking an exemption of Rs.21 crore, citing plans to set up a data centre on the site.
So far, the police have named Digvijay Patil, suspended sub-registrar Ravindra Taru, tehsildar Suryakant Yewale, and power of attorney holder Shital Tejwani as accused in the FIR and charge-sheet. On Monday, Yewale's lawyer, Harshad Nimbalkar, submitted that he was not involved in the alleged crime. But the state opposed the plea.
After the court was informed that Parth Pawar had not been made an accused "as he is very highly influential and the son of the Deputy Chief Minister of the State of Maharashtra", the court directed the DGP and the investigating officer to explain within two weeks why Parth had not been named as an accused....
इस लेख के रीप्रिंट को खरीदने या इस प्रकाशन का पूरा फ़ीड प्राप्त करने के लिए, कृपया
हमे संपर्क करें.