JAMMU, Sept. 13 -- In a development that will have far-reaching implications and offer relief to the local communities, lieutenant governor Vinai Kumar Saxena, has directed the completion of the settlement of rights and claims of local communities in three protected areas of Ladakh - Hemis National Park, High Altitude Cold Desert (Changthang) Wildlife Sanctuary and Karakoram (Nubra-Shyok) Wildlife Sanctuary - within two months. This will pave the way for a lawful and participatory process for finalising their boundaries, particularly in the newly created districts. The direction was issued during the 16th meeting of the newly constituted State Board for Wildlife (SBWL), UT Ladakh, chaired by the LG on Friday. One of the key agendas of the board meeting was the consideration of the sub-committee report on finalisation of the boundaries of these three protected wildlife areas. The decision is expected to bring long-awaited clarity and certainty to local communities, who have been seeking clarity regarding the boundaries of the protected areas and recognition of their longstanding settlements, habitations and traditional rights. It has been the demand of the local people that settlements and human habitations exist for a very long time in these areas, which clearly falls outside the purview of the wildlife sanctuary. However, the earlier formed sub-committee included all these areas. The erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir government had issued a preliminary notification of the boundaries of these sanctuaries in 1987. However, the board, while deliberating threadbare on the final notification of the three protected areas, noted that the notification issued by the erstwhile government of Jammu and Kashmir, had not correctly mapped the boundaries of the protected areas on the ground. Saxena, during the board meeting, observed that the statutory process prescribed under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, for settlement of rights of individuals and communities residing in the proposed protected areas, has not been undertaken by the committee. He noted that this process was not initiated and that the delineation of boundaries was carried out through a table-top exercise, without adherence to the legal framework. This rendered the exercise inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, inequitable to affected communities, and susceptible to legal challenges. The board observed that several of the areas, included in the sub-committee report, are of strategic importance and relate to national security, and the mandatory defence considerations were not duly factored in the report of the subcommittee. Saxena also observed that the international boundaries, as depicted in the Survey of India maps, have not been taken as a reference point, which is essential while determining the limits of any protected area. Accordingly, taking a serious note of the discrepancies, the LG directed to set aside the report of the sub-committee....