U.S., Sept. 18 -- ClinicalTrials.gov registry received information related to the study (NCT07826182) titled 'Comparison Between Two Different Loops for Maxillary Canine Retraction' on Sept. 13.

Brief Summary: The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the clinical efficiency of two distinct loop mechanics for maxillary canine retraction, by comparing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement achieved, while assessing other dental parameters.

Study Start Date: Sept. 01

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Condition: Maxillary Canine Retraction

Intervention: DEVICE: Poul Gjessing (PG) spring

orthodontic patient treated by Poul Gjessing (PG) spring for canine retraction.

DEVICE: Modified Marcotte spring

orthodontic patient treated by Modifi...