New Delhi, Sept. 18 -- The Delhi High Court has held that an appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act is maintainable against an order passed by a Special Court under Section 25(6) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) confirming seizure or attachment of property allegedly linked to proceeds of terrorism.

A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja observed that an order under Section 25(6) of the UAPA is not an interlocutory order but finally adjudicates the rights of the concerned party insofar as the seizure or attachment of the property is concerned.

The court said Section 21 of the NIA Act provides a statutory right of appeal against any judgment, sentence or order of a Special Co...