New Delhi, Oct. 27 -- Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of Colombia dismissed an appeal after an artificial intelligence (AI) detector called Winston found that the filing contained "only 7% human content," holding that it could not, for this among other reasons, be admitted as a validly submitted pleading. Shortly thereafter, a lawyer, Emmanuel Alessio Velasquez, ran the court's own ruling through the same detector, which suggested that the judgment itself was 93% AI-generated.

X-raying documents for traces of AI seems to be all the rage these days. In September, an anonymous user posted Pangram results suggesting that Thelyson Orelien's novel C'etait ca ou mourir had been generated by AI. In response, the Goncourt jury took the extr...