New Delhi, Oct. 26 -- The Supreme Court on Monday refused to allow an accused in Delhi riots case, who is out on bail, to attend law classes at a university in Ghaziabad.
A bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M Pancholi refused to modify the bail conditions imposed on accused Shadab Ahmad not to leave the national capital during the trial in the case. Justice Kumar told Ahmad's counsel, "This we will not modify...We know why you joined that law college, leaving out all the law colleges inside Delhi."
Sensing the mood of the court, the counsel sought permission to withdraw the plea for modification of the bail condition, which the court allowed. At the outset, the counsel submitted that Ahmad had applied for admission to the LLB course conducted by Delhi University, but did not manage to get the enrollment.
Subsequently, he managed to get admission at a university in Ghaziabad, the counsel submitted, adding that Ahmad was on the path of "reformation". The bench dismissed the plea as withdrawn giving liberty to the accused to approach the trial court for the relief. Ahmad had filed a miscellaneous application seeking modification of a bail condition, which prohibits him from leaving the national capital territory without prior permission of the trial court. He also sought modification of the bail condition which mandated him to mark his attendance at the Crime Branch police station of Delhi police twice a week on Monday and Thursday.
On January 5, the top court refused to grant bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, while granting bail to Ahmad and four others. It had imposed 11 conditions on them and said that any misuse of liberty would attract bail cancellation.
Published by HT Digital Content Services with permission from Millennium Post.