Kuala Lampur, July 30 -- For years, I hesitated to write about a persistent problem in the humanitarian sector, concerned that public criticism might weaken confidence in institutions whose work remains essential. A former colleague's resignation, prompted by the contrast between a charity's modest public appeals and the conspicuous wealth of its leadership, persuaded me that silence can be equally damaging. Drawing on more than two decades of experience, I offer these anonymised observations not as judicial findings or accusations, but as an examination of a recurring governance failure: authority concentrated within a family or small circle, weak financial transparency, and religious language used to discourage legitimate scrutiny.

Vol...