AGARTALA, India, Feb. 19 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Jan. 19:

1. Heard both sides.

2. This Revision is filed against the order dt.19.05.2025 of the Additional Judge, Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura in T.S.(Div.) No.50 of 2022.

3. Vide the said order, the said Court had closed the evidence on the respondent side on the pretext that the petitioner's counsel did not crossexamine the witnesses produced by the respondent who had appeared on more than one occasion.

4. The reason assigned by the petitioner before the Court below was that on account of non-payment of arrears of interim maintenance in the criminal proceedings, she was unable to cross-examine the witnesses for the respondent, which conten...