AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20:
1. All respondents except respondent No.7 are served, but they have not engaged any counsel to defend themselves in these CRPs. So they are set ex parte.
2. Counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press these Revisions as against the respondent No.7 on the ground that she is residing in Bangladesh and the address of the said respondent is not known to the petitioner or her counsel.
3. Therefore, these Revisions are dismissed as against the respondent No.7 and would survive against the other respondents.
4. Heard counsel for petitioner/plaintiff.
5. These two Revisions are preferred against the common order dt.22.07.2025 passed by th...