RANCHI, India, Nov. 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 17:
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the Review-Petitioners assailed the order passed by the writ court by submitting that there is an error apparent on the face of the record.
3. It appears that the Review-Petitioners have questioned the findings of Writ Court and argued that the case of appointees of work charge establishment and that of the daily wagers appointed prior to regularization are different and not the same.
4. It has also been argued that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had no intention to give the benefit of past services to the employees and the direction was limited to mere regularization of the services of the...