RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9:
1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents.
2. The petitioner claims the benefit of ACP and MACP which according to the petitioner has not been considered by the respondents, though representation has been filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has worked for 35 years without ACP and MACP and his representation is already pending before the respondents, suffice it would be, if a direction is given to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that if the...