RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22:
1. Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and learned counsel representing the respondents.
2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was allowed to work as In-charge Principal but now the petitioner has been removed.
3. From the order which is impugned, that is removal of the petitioner as In-charge Principal, I find that there is no allegation leveled against the petitioner by the respondents. Thus, the order is not stigmatic.
4. There is no substantive post as "In-charge Principal". It is merely an interim arrangement over which the petitioner has no substantive right. To be an "In-charge" is not a substantive righ...