Chandigarh, Oct. 11 -- A day after Chandigarh Police registered an FIR against Haryana DGP Shatrujeet Singh Kapur and 10 other senior officers in connection with the alleged suicide of IGP Y Puran Kumar, his wife and IAS officer Amneet P Kumar has written to the UT senior superintendent of police (SSP), Kanwardeep Kaur, seeking corrections and amendments in the FIR. In her letter to the SSP on Friday, Amneet P Kumar alleged that the copy of FIR No. 156 dated October 9, 2025, provided to her was incomplete and unsigned, lacking critical details about the accused and missing key provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. She stated that the names of the accused persons were not mentioned clearly, despite being explicitly identified in her complaint and her husband's "Final Note." Amneet, who is the commissioner and secretary of the Haryana government's department of foreign cooperation, said though the first information report was handed over to her personally at her official residence in Sector 24A by a senior police official, it did not mention the names of the accused officers, which she claimed were "the trigger point" behind her husband's death. "As per my complaint, the names of the accused: (1) Shatrujeet Singh Kapur, Haryana director general of police, and (2) Narendra Bijarniya, IPS, Rohtak superintendent of police, have not been entered in the FIR. According to the prescribed FIR document format, all accused should be clearly listed under Column No. 7," she wrote, urging that the document be amended. In the FIR registered by Chandigarh Police, Column No. 7, which is meant to list the "details of known/suspected/unknown accused with full particulars," has been filled merely as "as per Final Note." However, in FIRs, usually, the column ordinarily must explicitly mention the names, addresses, and details of the accused individuals based on the complainant's statement or available evidence. "By leaving out the names and replacing them with a vague reference, the FIR fails to directly attribute culpability and weakens the foundation of the investigation. The omission gives the accused an undue procedural advantage, as it allows room for ambiguity and manipulation in later stages of the probe. It also affects the transparency and accountability of the investigation, since the FIR is the primary legal document that sets the course for criminal proceedings," said an advocate close to the family, on condition of anonymity. "The accused persons who led to the trigger of extreme step should have been named. By grouping everyone together, it weakens the chain of abetment or discrimination. The principle of common intention (Section 34 of the IPC, now mirrored under Section 3(5) of the BNS) is typically applied when all accused acted together with a shared intent. There are concerns over dilution of key accused role in the suicide," said the advocate. Responding to the family's allegation, IG Pushpender Kumar said, "There is nothing wrong with Column 7 as per family's allegation. We have not excluded anyone and included everyone as per FIR contents." Amneet alleged that the Sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act invoked in the FIR were "diluted" and sought inclusion of Section 3(2)(v) of the Act, which pertains to offences committed against a person on the grounds of their caste leading to serious harm or death....