New Delhi, June 15 -- The 16-city FIFA World Cup 2026 is under criticism for its environmental impact. Most of the emissions result from air travel by fans and the teams of the football championship, as venues change across Mexico, the United States and Canada. The demand for new infrastructure, such as stadia, also worsens this impact. The arguments against FIFA are that not only will it emit significant carbon emissions, but that its attempts to buy carbon credits are extremely inadequate and cannot prevent the environmental cost of travel. To better understand FIFA, I compared data that would help me compare it to the other disaster in our midst-West Asia War. In the first fortnight, according to the Climate and Community Institute, the ...