India, Aug. 26 -- The Supreme Court's attempt at distinguishing between good and bad humour, and free speech for commercial purposes and non-commercial purposes is a fraught project. Hearing petitions linked to offensive remarks against persons with disabilities during an online show by comedians Samay Raina and others, the top court on Monday cautioned social media influencers and podcasters that they cannot press their free speech rights when their "commercial" content offends the dignity and sensitivities of others. The top court bench underlined that podcasters and YouTubers earn money from their shows and appeared to stress that as far as "commercial speech" is concerned, there is no freedom of speech. Not just that, it went one step...