Nepal, March 12 -- The sweeping success of the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) in Nepal's March 2026 general election has revived an important institutional debate: Whether the country's electoral system adequately balances representation, stability and legitimacy. The RSP itself has emphasised constitutional amendment as a policy priority, and one area that merits serious reflection is electoral design. The debate is not about weakening democratic pluralism; rather, it concerns how Nepal can refine its electoral rules so that plural representation, stable governance and institutional legitimacy evolve together.
Nepal's parliamentary elections operate under the framework of the Constitution of Nepal 2015, which combines first-past-the-pos...
Click here to read full article from source
To read the full article or to get the complete feed from this publication, please
Contact Us.