RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. Heard Mr. A. S. Dayal, learned counsel for the appellant and Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned A.P.P. for the State. ... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. Heard Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Mr. P.K. Appu, learned A.P.P. in Cr. Appe... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: I.A. No. 3966 of 2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. This application has been preferred ... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P. This appeal is directe... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. The objection filed by Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, learned A.P.P. is acc... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. Heard Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Suraj Verma, learned Spl. P.P. 2. This... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.03.2025 pas... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: The objection filed by Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P. is accepted. Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: The objection filed by Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P. is accepted. Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the... Read More
RANCHI, India, June 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against the judgment dated 20.0... Read More