PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners ap... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bai... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Issue notice to O.P.-2 by both process i.... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard the parties. 2. Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that learned trial court issued t... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a ... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More